INTEGRATING ECONOMICS WITH BRANDING / VALUE CHAIN

BUSINESS MODELS
The industrial revolution ushered in the manufacturing business model. This was characterized by the procurement of raw materials, transformations on the factory floor, outputs in the form of a tangible finished products, followed by storage in inventory or shipment to markets. In this context, Michael Porter developed his Value Chain model. There has been a tectonic shift to intangible deliverables. EVI has brought Value Chains and Brand Promises into the 21st Century with deep reservoir of experience with cloud computing.
BUSINESS PROCESSES
EVI redesigns, re-engineers, streamlines, and optimizes business processes to align with Brand Promises. From a technical perspective, these processes are translated into web services in a cloud computing environment. Often taking the form of microservices, business processes can be broken down into small steps or functions. In turn, the services are exposed via application programming interfaces (APIs). It is vital for an enterprise to consistently deliver on Brand Promises with processes and services that can be scaled and rapidly deployed.
MODERN BRAND PROMISES
It could be argued that digital brands fall into two categories: Platform Brands and Links in Value Chains. Platform Brands require the network effect to maximize their value, and this page will not focus on them. Rather, EVI focuses on Links in Value Chains. Each link is the best of breed, and may have identified a narrow niche that no other competitor serves in the same way. Each link is backed by a clearly defined Brand Promise. It articulates the customer value proposition, and implicitly promises to consistently deliver value.
CUSTOMER EXPERIENCES
Strategies and partnerships are meaningless without simple and seamless experiences when buyers interact with brands. EVI is driven to effectively integrate heterogeneous systems to create great moments that customers will remember. Moments that will add up to brand loyalty and referral to friends and colleagues. The 21st Century Value Chain can do this with the use of web services and application programming interfaces.
Andreesen Horowitz (A16Z) GP Martin Casado argues that APIs becomes the primary interface for business, which is resulting in a new way to think about software and value chains. Traditional monolithic applications and systems are being broken down into and being offered as services – exposed via APIs. New value chains are being created or innovated as services are being recombined by other companies to create something new.

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (APIs)

21st Century brands need to have a clear purpose – creating a differentiated competitive advantage (see the profile of Porter below). Each brand should focus on consistently executing value activities that support the differentiated competitive advantage. Enterprise Value Integration (EVI) refers to this a a Brand Promise. Everything else a brand does (activities that do not create value) can be standardized or even outsourced. APIs play a vital role in outsourcing digital, intangible, or automated activities to third parties. Well known APIs include Commission Junction, Google MapsDropboxStripe, MailChimp, and Salesforce. There are many more for specific industries, such as logistics with Expeditors Shipment Tracking, energy with Utility Score Tracking, destination optimization in transportation with Route Savvy, and availability of agricultural machinery with Equipment Watch.

APIs also enable one differentiated brand to partner with another to create a unique combination that serves customers in a new way or disrupts the market. Concepts can be quickly spun-up, market-tested, refined based on feedback and behavioral analysis and then formalized if successful. Ideas that are not appropriate for current market conditions can be quickly shelved and losses cut to a minimum.

Felimy Green, regional head of customer franchise at Citi Asia Pacific discusses the value of APIs to the bank and its customers. Green describes the bank’s approach to delivering on customer expectations and how APIs plays into it.

OPEN, PRIVATE AND PARTNER APIs

APIs work by exposing web services in a public (open) or private interface. API Academy explains “an open APIs is an interface that has been designed to be easily accessible by the wider population of Web and mobile developers. This means an open API may be used both by developers inside the organization that published the API or by any developers outside that organization who wish to register for access to the interface.” Some companies have a limit on the number of API calls a single site or server can make in a 24 hour period. This creates a business opportunity, with a “freemium” business model. The education and training site continue, “a private API is an interface that opens parts of an organization’s backend data and application functionality for use by developers working within (or contractors working for) that organization.” The purpose of the private interface is to make it possible for internal developers to leverage existing services very rapidly.

There is also a hybrid model, appropriate for building value chains with third-parties, selected for strategic reasons. Partner APIs combine aspects of open and private interface models. These are often implemented to give internal developers of application a faster means to work with the API publisher.

Michael Porter authored Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance in 1985. The book introduced the idea of Value Chains to the public. Porter is a professor of economics at Harvard Business School. Throughout his career at Harvard, he has brought economic theory and strategy concepts to bear on many of the most challenging problems facing corporations, economies, and societies, including market competition and company strategy, economic development, the environment, and healthcare.

PORTER’S VALUE CHAIN

Michael Porter asserted “there are two basic types of competitive advantage: cost leadership and differentiation.” Differentiation is where EVI’s Brand Promise and Brand Architecture comes into focus. “In a differentiation strategy,” Porter continues, “a firm seeks to be unique in its industry along some dimensions that are widely valued by buyers. It selects one or more attributes that many buyers in an industry perceive as important, and uniquely positions itself to meet those needs. It is rewarded for its uniqueness with a premium price.” Porter argued that differentiation may vary significantly from one industry to another. He also asserted that the differentiation is not a single holistic concept, but is broken down into smaller components. This is also where is there is significant overlap with Enterprise Value Integration. EVI’s approach is to look at individual business processes and microservices as the smallest units of measure in quantifying the value created and delivered as part of the brand promise.

Michael Porter - Value Chain

@MICHAELEPORTER

This Value Chain video was produced by Ducere Business School, a social enterprise that delivers education initiatives in Australia and Africa.

COMPONENTS OF THE VALUE CHAIN

Porter writes, “the value chain disaggregates a firm into its strategically relevant activities in order to understand the behavior of costs and the existing potential sources of differentiation. A firm gains competitive advantage by performing these strategically important activities more cheaply or better than its competitors.” Porter keenly points out that profits are of the value it creates for customer that exceed the costs. In order words, differentiation – including the brand promise – is vital to stand out in the minds of buyers. Since his book was introduced in 1985, many companies have pursued the alternate generic strategy of lower costs, which is only a temporary fix in a highly globalized economy. There are always cheaper places to procure raw materials or components. This has led to tariffs.

Porter’s Value Chain model was based on the manufacturing industry, with transformation of raw materials and tangible assets delivered. This video has a three-step process in analysis in the service industry. Learn more at MindTools >

VALUE CHAINS ENABLE PARTNERSHIPS

Porter explains that “every value activity employee purchased inputs, human resources (labor & management), and some form of technology to perform its function.” This is based on the manufacturing industry, which has tangible inputs (raw materials) and tangible outputs (assets) in the form of products or finished goods. The service industry does not necessarily have purchased inputs. Enterprise Value Integration has advanced value chains in the age of cloud computing, with the premise that inputs may be from partners or third parties. In this context, application programming interfaces (APIs) are enabling technologies that make partnerships easier to spin-up and test in the market. Each partner in the modern serverless value chain brings a competitive advantage to the relationship to benefit customers. APIs can publicly expose processes and microservices that execute the brand promise. Brands can also create private and secure access, with limited views of proprietary data.

This video analyzed IKEA, a Swedish-founded multinational group that designs and sells ready-to-assemble furniture, kitchen appliances and home accessories, among other goods and occasionally home services. It has been the world’s largest furniture retailer since 2008.

DATA IS INTEGRAL TO VALUE CHAINS

Porter notes, “every value activity also uses and creates information, such as buyer data, performance parameters, and product failure statistics.” The author continued, “value activities may also create financial assets such as inventory and accounts receivable, or liabilities such as accounts payable.” He made emphasized that value activities and accounting classifications rarely are the same. Therefore, there is a need to evolve accounting systems to address value activities in detail, and not abstract financials in a way that has little to do with the brand promise and its competitive differentiation in the market. IKEA has many prototypical characteristics of Porter’s value chain model, because it has tangible goods. Porter points to five categories of value activities that would apply to IKEA: Inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing & sales, as well as service.

McDonald’s is a fast food company, founded in the United States in 1940. After Ray Kroc bought it from the McDonald’s brothers, it introduced and expanded various franchise business models. It now serves over 69 million customers daily in over 100 nations, across approximately 36,900 outlets

VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS

A consulting firm found that around 80% of McDonald’s restaurants are owned and operated by independent franchisees. Research Methodology found that conventional franchise, developmental license, or affiliate are the three types of McDonald’s franchise restaurant formats. Regarding the value chain with McDonald’s, there are differences between each type of franchisee, but there are three primary value activities: Outbound Logistics, Marketing & Sales, and Service.

SERVICE. McDonald’s put the “fast” in fast food, with business processes designed to reduce wait time of customers after they place an order. Many of the ingredients have been prepared with only a final step required to finish the product for consumption.

MARKETING & SALES. Locations of McDonald’s are designed to reinforce brand presence, supported by extensive print, online and broadcast media advertising. McDonald’s advertising budget in the US alone equaled to USD 1.42 billion in 2014.

OUTBOUND LOGISTICS. McDonald’s uses various formats to reach consumers and deliver fast food quickly. Drive-thru is popular at rush hour, often integrated with sit-down restaurants. They also have counter-service outlets in food courts.

Aurora Automotive Company was formed in the mid-1950s by Alfred A. Juliano, a Catholic priest. It was partially financed by parishioners of his church in Connecticut. A value chain analysis was conducted by Astranti.

PREDICTING FUTURE STATES OF VALUE CHAINS

The consulting firm Deloitte conducted forward-looking value chain analysis on the automotive industry, with four possible scenarios. The worst case scenario “the fallen giant,” which cannot even survive. Second worst is the emergence of the “stagnant car maker,” with cars that have fewer technologies and autonomous features than the innovators. Then there are two additional scenarios which draw a contrast between data and platforms. The “hardware platform provider” is poised to focus more on the machine, and less on the software. This enables internet giants such as Google, Apple, and Facebook to create brand experiences. While the “data and mobility manager” thrives in a connected world. In this scenario, auto makers/OEMs set standards and have a rich portfolio of products and services. In the data and software realm, these OEMs will thrive with consumer data, mobility analytics, backend development, and service platforms.

VALUE CHAIN MANAGEMENT

- Zohreh Khalilpourshiraz

In order to reduce costs and increase the efficiency of the supply chain system, cross-docking is one of the essential warehousing management strategies to combine products from different suppliers to different customers. In this study, a particular state of cross-docking is considered in which inbound trucks can also be used as outbound trucks while it brings benefits such as reduced unloading, loading, and truck rental costs. In this state of the problem, a mathematical model has been developed to obtain the appropriate answer. Also, we solve the model and determine the accuracy of modelling from optimisation software such as GAMS and MATLAB. Also, we consider meta-heuristic algorithms, and the experimental results demonstrate the ability to compete with the proposed different meta-heuristic algorithms. They can improve the best-known solutions for occurrences inbound and obtain better outcomes for the ant lion optimiser than two other algorithms, with an average improvement of 53.6%. The proposed meta-heuristic outperforms a standard ant lion optimiser algorithm on more significant capacity instances, maintaining solution quality within reasonable CPU times.

- Jukka Majava

Managing disruptions has become increasingly important due to COVID-19 pandemic, trade wars, and other crises and disruptions that have affected supply chains worldwide. However, prior research has mainly focused on major crises and disruptions instead of frequently occurring operational disruptions that lead to smaller disruptive events. This study focuses on managing disruptive events in an order fulfilment process in a global supply chain. Both literature review and an analysis of empirical case are utilised. The results highlight a need to create new ways for both preventive and corrective actions to manage the disruptive events. These include improving the visibility and communication of order delivery plans and creating rules how corrective actions should be implemented. For preventive actions, an accurate supply chain performance measurement and systematic process development practices are recommended. The study provides both practitioners and researchers with new knowledge on how disruptive events can be prevented and managed.

- Richard Ampofo Boadu

This study assesses the impact of project team characteristics, conceptualised as centrifugal and centripetal forces, on project success, and the role of process innovation. The results showed that, manager competence, risk management competence, reach to community, reach to suppliers and reach to organisation were significant determinants of project success with the interaction effect of manager competence, risk management competence, and process innovation supporting the hypotheses. The study recommends that, managers should provide good leadership to the project team and effectively coordinate the project team and its activities. With effective leadership, managers can influence team members to achieve a common goal.

- Oswald Atiga

This paper compared the perceptions of senior management staff of public and private medical commodity supply chains, using a concurrent mixed method research design to determine if differences existed in the factors affecting the medical commodity supply chains in the Upper East region (UER) of Ghana. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected respectively, using purposive sampling, from 172 senior management staff of public and private healthcare facilities and six senior management officials from the central medical stores, regional medical stores and other key staff of both medical commodity supply chains in the region. The study found that private medical commodity chains had better medical commodity availability than public chains. It also found that significant differences existed between public and private healthcare facilities regarding the availability of medical commodities. No significant differences however existed for in-vehicle security, cold chain facilities, pilferage, communication of stock-out information, transport availability and vehicle maintenance practices.

- Robert Sroufe

In this study, we examine the role of collaboration during the new product development (NPD) process. Previous NPD research has investigated issues such as the timing and extent of involvement of suppliers and the purchasing and supply management (PSM) department in the NPD process, with mixed results. A potential answer for the mixed results is whether an empowered PSM department, i.e., one that can act on behalf of another party, controls the NPD process. To help understand this empowerment, we developed and tested a model using survey data collected from 216 companies. Our findings indicate that empowering the PSM department can improve NPD results internally, as well as externally through collaborative relationships. Furthermore, those factors that account for collaboration differences provide an essential context for researchers and management decision-makers.

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

RSS Error: A feed could not be found at http://feeds.feedburner.com/scmr/rss/recentlyfiled?format=xml. This does not appear to be a valid RSS or Atom feed.

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate

PROGRAMMABLE WEB

RSS Error: A feed could not be found at http://feeds.feedburner.com/ProgrammableWeb. A feed with an invalid mime type may fall victim to this error, or SimplePie was unable to auto-discover it.. Use force_feed() if you are certain this URL is a real feed.